Many industries have dropped into a recession or a downright depression.
Oil, coal, iron ore, gas, and many other commodity prices are at near term (or all time) lows.
When the economy goes bad, the natural tendency is for companies to cut costs (and lay people off). Of course, we’ve seen this in many industries and the repercussion have been felt around the world.
Since many of our clients are in the effected industries, we think about how we could help.
If you could use some help … read on!
I think the first way we can help is to remind TapRooT® Users and management at companies that use TapRooT® that in hard times, it is easy for employees to hear they wrong message.
What is the wrong message?
Workers and supervisors think that because of the tough economic times, they need to cut corners to save money. Therefore, they shortcut safety requirements.
- A mechanic might save time by not locking out a piece of equipment while making an adjustment.
- An operator might take shortcuts when using a procedure to save time.
- Pre-job hazard analyses or pre-job brief might be skipped to save time.
- Facility management might cut operating staff or maintenance personnel below the level needed to operate and maintain a facility safely.
- Supervisors may have to use excessive overtime to make up for short staffing after layoffs.
- Maintenance may be delayed way past the point of being safe because funds weren’t available.
These changes might seem OK at first. When shortcuts are taken and no immediate problems are seen, the decision to take the shortcut seems justified. This starts a culture shift. More shortcuts are deemed acceptable.
In facilities that have multiple Safeguards (often true in the oil, mining, and other industries that ascribe to process safety management), the failure of a single Safeguard or even multiple Safeguards may go unnoticed because there is still one Safeguard left that is preventing a disaster. But every Safeguard has weaknesses and when the final Safeguard fails … BOOM!
This phenomenon of shortcuts becoming normal has a PhD term … Normalization of Deviation.
The result of normalization of deviation? Usually a major accident that causes extensive damage, kills multiple people, and ruins a company’s reputation.
So, the first thing that we at System Improvements can do to help you through tough times is to say …
This could be happening to your operators, your mechanics, or your local management and supervision.
When times are bad you MUST double up on safety audits and management walk arounds to make sure that supervisors and workers know that bad times are not the time to take shortcuts. Certain costs can’t be cut. There are requirements that can’t be eliminated because times are tough and the economy is bad.
When times are tough you need the very BEST performance just to get by.
When times are tough, you need to make sure that your incident investigation programs and trending are catching problems and keeping performance at the highest levels to assure that major accidents don’t happen.
Your incident investigation system and your audit programs should produce KPI’s (key performance indicators) that help management see if the problems mentioned above are happening (or are being prevented).
If you aren’t positive if your systems are working 100%, give us a call (865-539-2139) and we would be happy to discuss your concerns and provide ideas to get your site back on the right track. For industries that are in tough times, we will even provide a free assessment to help you decide if you need to request additional resources before something bad happens.
Believe me, you don’t want a major accident to be your wake up call that your cost cutting gone too far.
How would you like to save time and effort and still have effective root cause analysis of small problems (to prevent big problems from happening)?
For years I’ve had users request “TapRooT®-Lite” for less severe incidents and near-misses. I’ve tried to help people by explaining what needed to be done but we didn’t have explicit instructions.
Last summer I started working on a new book about using TapRooT® to find the root causes of low-to-medium risk incidents. And the book is now finished and back from the printers.
- The book is only 50 pages long.
- It makes using TapRooT® easy.
- It provides the tools needed to produce excellent quality investigations with the minimum effort.
- It will become the basis for our 2-Day TapRooT® Root Cause Analysis Course.
When can you get the book? NOW! Our IT guys have a NEW LINK to the new book on our store.
By April, we should have our 2-Day TapRooT® Course modified and everything should be interlinked with our new TapRooT® Version VI Software.
In hard economic times, getting a boost in productivity and effectiveness in a mission critical activity (like root cause analysis) is a great helping hand for our clients.
The new book is the first of eight new books that we will be publishing this year. Watch for our new releases and take advantage of the latest improvements in root cause analysis to help your facility improve safety, quality, and efficiency even when your industry is in tough economic times. For more information on the first of the new books, see:
If you need help, give us a call. (865-539-2139)
Are you having a backlog of investigations because of staff cuts? We can get you someone to help perform investigations on a short term basis.
Need to get people trained to investigate low-to-medium risk incidents effectively (and quickly)? We can quote a new 2-Day TapRooT® Root Cause Analysis Course t to be held at your site.
Need a job because of downsizing at your company? Watch the postings at the Root Cause Analysis Blog. We pass along job notices that require TapRooT® Root Cause Analysis skills.
This isn’t the first time that commodity prices have plummeted. Do you remember the bad times in the oil patch back in 1998? We helped our clients then and we stand by to help you today! We can’t afford to stop improvement efforts! Nobody wants to see people die to maintain a profit margin or a stock’s price. Let’s keep things going and avoid major accidents while we wait for the next economic boom.
The new littoral combat ship USS Milwaukee suffered an embarrassing breakdown while transiting to Norfolk. The Navy is doing a “root cause analysis” of the failure. See the story at:
When I read these press stories I always think:
What techniques are they using and will they really find the root causes and fix them?
All too often the final answer is “No.”
Image of debris on track before the collision, looking east.
Train 1C89 approached on the right-hand track (image courtesy of a member of the public)
RAIB has today released its report into a collision between a train
and a fallen bridge parapet at Froxfield, Wiltshire, 22 February 2015
At around 17:31 hrs on 22 February 2015, a high speed passenger train (HST), the 16:34 hrs First Great Western service from London Paddington to Penzance, struck and ran over part of the fallen masonry parapet of an overline bridge at Froxfield, Wiltshire.
The train was fully loaded with around 750 passengers and was travelling at a speed of 86 mph (138 km/h) when the driver saw the obstruction. He applied the emergency brake but there was insufficient distance to reduce the speed significantly before the train struck the parapet. The train did not derail and came to a stop around 720 metres beyond the bridge. There were no injuries. The leading power car sustained damage to its leading bogie, braking system, running gear and underframe equipment.
The immediate cause of the collision was that the eastern parapet of Oak Hill Road overline bridge had been pushed off and onto the tracks, by a heavy goods vehicle which had reversed into it. The train had not been stopped before it collided with the debris because of delays in informing the railway about the obstruction on the tracks.
RAIB has made four recommendations relating to the following:
- installation of identification plates on all overline bridges with a carriageway unless the consequence of a parapet falling onto the tracks or a road vehicle incursion at a particular bridge are assessed as likely to be minor
- enhancing current road vehicle incursion assessment procedures to include consideration of the risk from large road vehicles knocking over parapets of overline bridges (two recommendations)
- introduction of a specific requirement in a Railway Group Standard relating to the onward movement of a train that is damaged in an incident, so that the circumstances of the incident and the limitations of any on-site damage assessment are fully considered when deciding a suitable speed restriction, especially when there are passengers on board.
RAIB has also identified two learning points, one for police forces regarding the importance of contacting the appropriate railway control centre immediately when the safety of the line is affected and the other for road vehicle standards bodies and the road haulage industry about the benefits of having reversing cameras or sensors fitted to heavy goods vehicles
Notes to editors
- The sole purpose of RAIB investigations is to prevent future accidents and incidents and improve railway safety. RAIB does not establish blame, liability or carry out prosecutions.
- RAIB operates, as far as possible, in an open and transparent manner. While our investigations are completely independent of the railway industry, we do maintain close liaison with railway companies and if we discover matters that may affect the safety of the railway, we make sure that information about them is circulated to the right people as soon as possible, and certainly long before publication of our final report.
- For media enquiries, please call 020 7944 3108.
For the complete report, see:
1. Take a picture of you putting TapRooT® into action.
2. Email your picture to firstname.lastname@example.org with…
-Subject line “Where in the world is TapRooT®?”
-A one sentence description of where you are using TapRooT®
3. Extended to January 29! Wait for the winner to be announced on January 29 via a blog post and the TapRooT® Friends and Experts e-newsletter. (Not a subscriber? Email email@example.com with subject “Subscribe”)
We will put all entries into a hat and draw for the winner on January 29.
Prize! Your choice of TapRooT® gear: a tumbler, a car audio kit or a hat (all pictured below). Win the contest and choose your prize.
“How far away is death?” and “What does a bad day look like?” are two popular blog columns on the TapRooT® blog that are featured every week in the TapRooT® Friends & Experts eNewsletter and include images and videos to think about like the one above. If you don’t get our eNewsletter every Tuesday, subscribe to be the first to learn about more fun contests.
Another successful 2-Day course in November in Bogota.
For more information on our Public Courses, click here.
IOGP SAFETY ALERT
FATALITY WHILE TRIPPING PIPE
Country: USA – North America
Location: OFFSHORE : Mobile Drilling Unit
Incident Date: 20 October 2015
Type of Activity: Drilling, workover, well services
Type of Injury: Struck by
View of pipe stand in lower fingerboard
A Deepwater drill crew was tripping in the hole with drill pipe.
As they were transferring a stand of pipe out of the setback area with a hydraracker, the stand caught on a finger at the 51′ lower fingerboard.
As the hydraracker continued to move, tension caused the pipe to bow and the pipe was released from the lower tailing arm with significant force toward the setback area striking and fatally injuring the employee.
What Went Wrong?
This investigation for this event is ongoing.
Corrective Actions and Recommendations:
While this incident is still under investigation, drilling rig operators using fingerboards with latches are recommended to:
- Review and assess applicability of NOV Product Information Bulletin 85766409 and NOV Safety Alert Product Bulletin 95249112
- Verify a system is in place to confirm the opening and closing of fingerboard latches (by way of CCTV or spotter)
- Ensure personnel are kept clear of the setback area
Safety Alert Nnumber: 268
IOGP Safety Alerts http://safetyzone.iogp.org/
Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, neither the IOGP nor any of its members past present or future warrants its accuracy or will, regardless of its or their negligence, assume liability for any foreseeable or unforeseeable use made thereof, which liability is hereby excluded. Consequently, such use is at the recipient’s own risk on the basis that any use by the recipient constitutes agreement to the terms of this disclaimer. The recipient is obliged to inform any subsequent recipient of such terms.
This document may provide guidance supplemental to the requirements of local legislation. Nothing herein, however, is intended to replace, amend, supersede or otherwise depart from such requirements. In the event of any conflict or contradiction between the provisions of this document and local legislation, applicable laws shall prevail.
Students working hard in a recent 2-Day Course in Bogota.
For more information on our Public Courses, click here.
A successful 5-Day Public Course in Monterrey recently.
For more information on our Public Courses, click here.