Is “Failure to Test” a “Root Cause”?


Picture 25.png

The Sydney Morning Herald reported:

Failure to test a cement casing at an oil well in the Timor Sea was a root cause of a blowout that caused Australia’s worst offshore oil spill, an inquiry has heard.

See the article at:

http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/casing-test-failure-cause-of-oil-spill-20100315-q99q.html

It sure seems like there were many more “root causes” to me and that the analysis should have led to root causes that were much more in-depth. And it would be a big help if there was a SnapCharT® to help identify all of the Causal Factors.

What do you think?

Here’s the March 15 meeting transcript:

http://www.montarainquiry.gov.au/downloads/Transcripts/Transcript%20Montara%20COI_Day%20001_15-Mar-2010.pdf

And here’s the link to the Commission’s web site for more information:

http://www.montarainquiry.gov.au/index.html


6 people like this post.

5 Responses to “Is “Failure to Test” a “Root Cause”?”

  1. Mark Haskins says:

    In the report, after stating the “root cause” are the following questions… How and why did this occur? Why was the mistaken
    calculation concerning the volume of cement not detected at
    the time? What systems were in place to ensure that
    correct volumes of cement would be used in order to achieve
    top of cement above reservoir? What was the effect of
    using the wrong volume of cement in terms of the integrity
    of the cemented casing shoe as a barrier?
    I suspect the real root cause lies in the answers to these questions. I was always taught to keep asking questions until the evidence confesses with something you could fix.

  2. James Vera says:

    Hi Mark,

    Failure to test is definetly not a Root Cause. I guess I can only give them the benifit of a doubt that they meant Cotributory or Apparent cause, although that would still be an indicator of a lack of understanding of cause analysis terminology or definitions.

    Thanks,

    James

  3. Seidel Muriel says:

    Hi Mark
    Failure to test is not a Root Cause.
    ? Where are the people that must have planned and coustiously calculated the quality of the human resources, control equipment, Norms and Safety rules to do the Job?
    Did they benchmarked how this work has been successfully done in other oil well sea towers?
    For me the Root Cause according to its definitions is HUMAN ERRORS.
    My best wishes
    Seidel Muriel

  4. Dennis Wared says:

    Mark,

    My view is that “failure to test” would surely meet the definition of a causal factor, not a root cause.

    Best Regards to all the TapRoot(R) folks

    Dennis Ward

  5. Ron Zanoni says:

    I agree with Dennis and James that “failure to test” indicates a condition and possibly a causal factor, not a root cause.

Leave a Reply