Controversy on AECL’s Root Cause Analysis
When do you know you are in trouble? When the regulator rejects your root cause analysis. For details on this controversy, see:
http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5gknrGT_W6sZD8hF96G4mZPEjpg6g
Share on Facebook
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, July 23rd, 2008 at 9:38 am and is filed under Current Events, Investigations, Root Causes.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
The report from Talisman came out yesterday (July 28, 2008). I haven’t reviewed in yet, but I’d be very interested to see what comments TapRooT users have on it!
See:
http://www.nuclearsafety.gc.ca/eng/readingroom/reports/lessonslearned/index.cfm
The comment that blaming communications issues between (any) regulator and its licensees “is a scapegoat for more systemic problems” is a typical opposition comment. Communication seems to be a major problem here. I hesitate to say “root cause” without seeing the report yet. Why communication has broken down (or if it was ever in good shape to start with) is another question entirely!
This was a tough report to read.
Seems like it needed more graphics to make it more visually appealing and easy to understand.