Controversy on AECL’s Root Cause Analysis

When do you know you are in trouble? When the regulator rejects your root cause analysis. For details on this controversy, see:

http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5gknrGT_W6sZD8hF96G4mZPEjpg6g

2 Responses to “Controversy on AECL’s Root Cause Analysis”

  1. Corie Doyle says:

    The report from Talisman came out yesterday (July 28, 2008). I haven’t reviewed in yet, but I’d be very interested to see what comments TapRooT users have on it!
    See:
    http://www.nuclearsafety.gc.ca/eng/readingroom/reports/lessonslearned/index.cfm

    The comment that blaming communications issues between (any) regulator and its licensees “is a scapegoat for more systemic problems” is a typical opposition comment. Communication seems to be a major problem here. I hesitate to say “root cause” without seeing the report yet. Why communication has broken down (or if it was ever in good shape to start with) is another question entirely!

  2. Mark Paradies says:

    This was a tough report to read.

    Seems like it needed more graphics to make it more visually appealing and easy to understand.

Leave a Reply