June 6, 2011 | Mark Paradies

Monday Accident & Lessons Learned: OGP Safety Alert – Catastrophic Failures in Mooring Systems

 Safety Safetyalerts Alert Images 235 S235 Img1

OGP Safety Alert


Country: USA – North America

Type of Activity: Drilling, Workover, Well Services

In early 2011, a single point mooring system for a deepwater Gulf of Mexico (GOM) project failed at the tether chain for a free-standing hybrid riser, allowing the buoyancy air can and the free-standing flowline riser to separate. The 440-ton buoyancy air can rose suddenly to the surface while the free standing riser collapsed. Based on the investigation of this event and a review of historical events, BOEMRE is revising and re-issuing Safety Alert #259.

The investigation determined that a 6 3/4-inch diameter, 862-pound chain link in the tether chain had fractured and separated near its butt weld. Analysis of the fracture indicated that the chain link had a weld repair and the fracture initiated in the middle of the weld. Three links of the 24-link tether chain were found to have weld repairs. After the chain had been heat treated, the non-US based manufacturer had made weld repairs to the chain by grinding defects and filling the void with weld material. The chain was being built in accordance with Det Norske Veritas (DNV) Offshore Mooring Chain standard. Post heat treat weld repairs are disallowed per DNV’s Offshore Mooring Chain standard. The post heat treat weld repairs made the chain susceptible to hydrogen induced stress cracking due to the extreme hardness of the weld material and the residual stress within the weld.

As indicated in BOEMRE Safety Alert #259, issued January 16, 2008, catastrophic failure occurred in a portion of an anchoring system in two other separate incidents. One component failed on a system in the GOM. The other was found during installation to be defective after a similar component failed overseas.

What Went Wrong?:

 Safety Safetyalerts Alert Images 235 S235 Img2

Incident No. 1: A one-ton, 8+ inch-diameter shackle connecting a mooring system to anchoring pilings failed on an overseas floating production facility. Subsequently, an identical shackle scheduled to be used in a deepwater GOM production facility also failed catastrophically under test loads below specifications. Operator reviews of the manufacturing and testing procedure and additional material testing indicated that all of the shackles were possibly defective.

Because anchor pilings with shackles attached had already been driven, the GOM test failure required new shackles to be manufactured, new pilings installed and the replacement of portions of the mooring systems that could not be recovered. Production start-up of the facility has been delayed by at least one year.

 Safety Safetyalerts Alert Images 235 S235 Img3

Incident No. 2: Two sockets in a mooring system for a MODU failed under moderate loading. Testing of the remaining sockets found that others were also defective and a number of them failed catastrophically at less than specification loading.

The BOEMRE and the USCG 8th District concluded the following:

In both cases the manufacturing procedures are thought to have been defective. Heat treating after casting apparently resulted in a metal unable to meet “Charpy” standards for material “toughness.”

In both cases, the Operator’s and/or manufacturer’s specifications for the items were either out of date or inadequate.

In both cases the Operator’s material testing requirements were either not followed, or were not adequate to insure specifications were met.

Material handling during installation may have exposed the equipment to potential critical damage.

Corrective Actions and Recommendations:

The BOEMRE recommends the following:

• Operators should review their specifications requirements to insure testing and manufacturing produces a product that will meet the usage demands.

• Operators should include sufficient Charpy testing requirements in the specifications to insure the materials and manufacturing process will produce a product of sufficient toughness.

• Operators should review their requirements for both destructive and non-destructive testing of critical elements. Operators should insure their test coupons are properly representative.

• Operators should review their requirements for equipment inspection and handling to insure no damaging techniques are employed in transportation or installation.

Subsequent to the 2011 incident, the following recommendations are added:

• Operators should monitor and inspect critical mooring components 100% of the time during the manufacturing process.

• Operators should ensure that the personnel and companies contracted to perform inspections and quality assurance of critical mooring components are qualified to do so.

• Operators should treat the area above a buoyancy air can for a free-standing hybrid riser as potentially hazardous. No floating production facility or support vessel should be allowed to pass over a free-standing hybrid riser.

A Safety Alert is a tool used by BOEMRE to inform the offshore oil and gas industry of the circumstances surrounding an accident or a near miss. It also contains recommendations that should help prevent the recurrence of such an incident on the Outer Continental Shelf.

Source Contact:


Russell Hoshman: +1 (504) 736-2627
U.S. Department of the Interior
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management,
Regulation and Enforcement
Gulf of Mexico OCS Region

Ref: BOEMRE Safety Alert No. 296

safety alert number: 235

OGP Safety Alerts http://info.ogp.org.uk/safety/


Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, neither the OGP nor any of its members past present or future warrants its accuracy or will, regardless of its or their negligence, assume liability for any foreseeable or unforeseeable use made thereof, which liability is hereby excluded. Consequently, such use is at the recipient’s own risk on the basis that any use by the recipient constitutes agreement to the terms of this disclaimer. The recipient is obliged to inform any subsequent recipient of such terms.

This document may provide guidance supplemental to the requirements of local legislation. Nothing herein, however, is intended to replace, amend, supersede or otherwise depart from such requirements. In the event of any conflict or contradiction between the provisions of this document and local legislation, applicable laws shall prevail.

Show Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *