Airbus Swap Leads to Undetected Out-of-Balance Flight
UK investigators have revealed that an EasyJet Airbus A321neo operated from Bristol to Edinburgh while outside of its center-of-gravity envelope, after the aircraft was brought in to replace the smaller A320 originally scheduled for the service.
The condition was not detected until the Airbus was boarding at Edinburgh for the return service to Bristol, when the cabin manager remarked to the captain that passengers were not seated according to the loading form.
After the captain requested a manual zone count, the crew realized the passenger distribution was based on seating zones on the A320 rather than the A321neo. The captain ordered re-allocation of the passengers’ seats to correct the problem before departure.
The UK Air Accidents Investigation Branch says the crew had flown the prior Bristol-Edinburgh sector believing the centre-of-gravity was towards the forward limit – but still permissible – after entering load figures into the electronic flightbag.
But an EasyJet investigation found that, unknown to the crew, the Airbus had been outside of the operating envelope.
EasyJet had substituted a larger A321neo for the A320 originally scheduled to operate the flight.
Its analysis concluded that, after the aircraft type was swapped, the change was not identified by the departure control system responsible for generating the information recorded on the load form.
Although the turnaround coordinator prepared the load form with the correct aircraft and registration, he unwittingly completed the form with invalid data from the departure control system.
As a result the flight closed with a passenger distribution reflecting an A320 seating configuration, not that of an A321neo.
The Air Accidents Investigation Branch inquiry notes that mitigation procedures introduced in response to the Covid-19 pandemic played a role in the January 3 incident.
It says the turnaround coordinator would normally hand the load form directly to the crew, providing an opportunity for the pilots to query any last-minute changes. But pandemic procedures minimized interaction with the pilots, and the load form was instead delivered via the cabin manager.
“As the [coordinator] was not on the flight deck, the crew were more likely to accept changes presented to them without discussion,” the inquiry states, pointing out that the error was detected at Edinburgh after the cabin manager checked the load form.
Investigators also found that the Covid-19 environment had resulted in a high number of changes to EasyJet’s schedule, and a validation process for updating the departure control system was taking longer to run – with the result that some changes were not automatically detected.
“The various elements of the IT system architecture do not ‘talk’ directly to each other but operate through a variety of interfaces,” the inquiry states, making errors and inaccuracies “more likely.”
Although manual updates could be made after a swap of aircraft type, this process had not accounted for a scenario involving an update after boarding had already started.
“This serious incident was caused by a combination of operating factors in a complex system interacting in a manner which had neither been designed nor predicted,” the inquiry says.
EasyJet took several steps to improve safety after the incident, introducing procedures to conduct manual checks between IT systems when aircraft types are swapped, and for specific coordination between the chief pilot and duty pilot regarding type changes.
It is exploring the options for updating the IT system to cope better with communicating operational changes, and the carrier also requires a manual bay count to be completed before every departure to ensure that weight and balance calculations are accurate.
Source: FlightGlobal, “EasyJet A321neo flew out-of-balance after passengers seated for A320,” David Kaminski-Morrow, October 14, 2021.
Circumstances can crop up anywhere at any time if proper and safe sequence and procedures are not planned and followed. We encourage you to learn and use the TapRooT® System to find and fix problems.
TapRooT® has a team of investigators and instructors with years of extensive training ready to offer assistance worldwide. We also offer ongoing support to our clients through free newsletters and root cause tip videos, the root cause analysis blog, and our annual Global TapRooT® Summit.
Register for one of our courses. We offer a basic 2-day course and an advanced 5-day course. Contact us or call 865.539.2139 about having a course at your site or for further root cause analysis opportunities. We’re here to find solutions for you.